4–6 Months Earlier Risk Detection. $15–20M Saved. 30–40% Faster Decisions. 8–12 Weeks Predictive Signals.

Outcomes

What we did

4–6 Months

Portfolio visibility

$15–20M

Manual coordination cycles

30–40%

Governance across all teams

8–12 Wks

Milestone predictability

About Company
A CMO of a leading global R&D operation in Basel, Switzerland is overseeing 10–25 active Phase II–III programs across multiple CROs and regions.

Operational, safety, and enrollment signals remain fragmented across systems, with risks surfacing only during monthly or quarterly reviews — often 4–6 months after early indicators appear.

With $10M–$20M exposure per program, delayed visibility directly impacts portfolio decisions and increases the risk of late-stage failure.
Challenges

Key Barriers
to Trial Execution

Portfolio Blind Spots
Fragmented updates across CROs
Risks identified in late-stage reviews
6+ months delay in detection
Slow Decision Cycles
Manual analytics and reporting
Delayed critical decisions
Limited ability to course-correct
Late Signal Detection
CRO performance gaps missed
Slow enrollment trends overlooked
Safety signals detected too late
No Unified Visibility
Fragmented reports across teams
No single source of truth
Reactive risk management
Core platform

Operational Solution

Maxis AI Agentic Workflows — Under Human Oversight Throughout

Continuous Portfolio Monitoring

Unified view of safety and enrollment
AI agents monitor across studies
Risks detected months earlier
4–6 months earlier detection

Automated Progress Reporting

Automated reporting and compliance checks
Human-in-the-loop validation
Replaces manual analytics cycles
30–40% faster decision cycles

Predictive Risk Intelligence

Early signals on CRO performance and enrollment
Governance-driven risk detection
8–12 weeks early intervention
$15–20M cost avoided per program
Maxis AI operated as a governed  and supervised execution layer within existing systems throughout.
Core platform

Measured Impact

Quantified Outcomes After Deploying Maxis AI’s Agentic Workflows
MetricBefore Agentic AIAfter Agentic AI
Time to detect riskIssues surfaced during late-stage reviews, often 6+ months after early signals were presentRisk signals detected 4–6 months earlier through continuous supervised monitoring
Decision cyclesManual reporting delays slowing critical go/no-go decisions across portfolio30–40% faster portfolio decision cycles; earlier course corrections protecting pipeline value
Program cost exposureCostly late-stage program termination with limited recovery options$15M–$20M potential cost avoided per program through early adjustment
Predictive foresightStatic KRI reviews — risks identified weeks too late to resolve cost-effectivelyPredictive risk signals 8–12 weeks in advance across all trials and CRO partners
Stakeholder visibilityFragmented reports from multiple teams, no single source of truthUnified portfolio view with real-time trial signals under expert oversight
Outcomes

Early identification of failure probability in a Phase III program enabled leadership to re-scope, reallocate resources, and prevent significant late-stage development losses.

Late-phase trial risk detected 4–6 months earlier than traditional monitoring
$15M–$20M potential cost avoided through early portfolio adjustment and resource reallocation
30–40% faster portfolio decision cycles through centralized trial intelligence
8–12 weeks predictive risk foresight — governance and audit traceability maintained

Looking for Agentic AI for clinical trials?

Explore our Agentic AI Platform to see how AI agents are transforming study startup, data management, oversight, and regulatory submissions.