Phase 2 Delivered. No Biometrics Build. DB Lock in 3–4 Months.

Outcomes

What we did

3–4 Months

DB lock vs 8–10 projected

4–6 Months

Submission accelerated

60–70%

Queries auto-resolved

0

Permanent hires required

About Company
A Series B oncology biotech company, moving from Phase 1 to a 12-site, multi-regional Phase 2, did not have the internal biometrics infrastructure to support the effort.

The company, based in San Diego, California, one of the most active biotech centers for oncology in the country, had robust Phase 1 results but lacked in-house data management and statistical programming capabilities.

Development of an in-house infrastructure would require 12 to 18 months, which the company could not afford. Additionally, a full-service CRO approach would require an unbalanced proportion of the available budget. The company needed to have execution capacity but not build a team or require a full-service CRO.
Challenges

Key Barriers
to Trial Execution

No Biometrics Infrastructure
No data management or programming setup
No submission workflows in place
Built from scratch
Data Fragmentation
Data spread across 12 sites and systems
Data spread across 12 sites and systems
Limited data visibility
DB Lock Timeline Risk
8–10 month DB lock projection
Too slow for investor timelines
Regulatory risk
Compliance Requirement
ICH E6(R3) RBQM required
No governance or validation framework
Risk before study start
Core platform

Operational Solution

Maxis AI Agentic Workflows — Under Human Oversight Throughout

AI for Data Management

Unified data layer across 12 sites
No infrastructure build needed
15K–25K queries managed

AI for RBQM

ICH E6(R3)-compliant
RBQM operational from first patient in
60–70% queries auto-resolved
ICH E6(R3) compliant day 1

AI for Programming

Submission-ready datasets delivered
3–4 months vs 8–10 months
4–6 months earlier submission
Maxis AI operated as a governed  and supervised execution layer within existing systems throughout.
Core platform

Measured Impact

Quantified Outcomes After Deploying Maxis AI’s Agentic Workflows
MetricBefore Agentic AIAfter Agentic AI
Database ReadinessNo biometrics infrastructure; 8–10 month DB lock projected; 12 sites, no unified data viewDatabase lock in 3–4 months; submission advanced 4–6 months
Biometrics CapabilityNo DM or programming infrastructure; ICH E6(R3) RBQM not yet in place60–70% queries auto-resolved; RBQM operational from first patient in
Execution VisibilityLimited — no central data tracking across sitesContinuous — real-time view across all 12 sites
CRO DependencyFull-service CRO would consume runway; no internal team to build onPhase 2 delivered without permanent team build; investor milestone met
Execution PredictabilityVariable — no historical baseline, high uncertaintyImproved — AI-driven risk signals and milestone tracking from day one
Outcomes

Phase 2 delivered without a permanent biometrics team build — database lock achieved in 3–4 months versus the 8–10 month projection, advancing submission by 4–6 months.

DB lock in 3–4 months vs 8–10 projected
60–70% queries auto-resolved — no permanent data management hires needed
ICH E6(R3) audit-ready — investor milestone met on time
No infrastructure build — operated within sponsor systems from day one

Looking for Agentic AI for clinical trials?

Explore our Agentic AI Platform to see how AI agents are transforming study startup, data management, oversight, and regulatory submissions.